Can you retire at 60 with $2M?

With $2M at age 60, you can safely spend about $84,000/year after tax ($7,000/month) without running out over a ~35-year retirement — about a 4.2% withdrawal rate, a touch above the classic 4% rule, which a shorter horizon like this can support. Whether that's enough comes down to your lifestyle; here's the full picture.

How long $2M lasts at different spending levels

The 4% rule is a starting point, not a guarantee — especially retiring at 60, when the money may need to last 35+ years. Here's what $2M supports, spending from age 60 to 95 at a 6% nominal return and 3% inflation:

Why the answer isn't just $2M × 4%

A back-of-envelope "$2M × 4% = $80,000" is actually a conservative floor at 60 — the full projection supports more:

• The 4% rule is deliberately cautious. It's a single number meant to survive almost any 30-year retirement. Run this portfolio for real and the sustainable spend works out to about a 4.2% rate — above a flat 4% — even before any other income.
• Taxes still take a cut. Traditional 401(k)/IRA withdrawals are ordinary income and taxable-brokerage gains are taxed too; only Roth and cash come out tax-free. That trims the figure to $84,000/year after tax — still above the naive 4% draw at this age.

The portfolio, year by year

Spending the sustainable $84,000/yr from $2M at age 60, here's how the portfolio holds up in today's dollars (inflation-adjusted, so it reflects real spending power):

Retiring at a different age with $2M

Age is the single biggest lever here, because it sets how many years the money has to cover. The same $2M supports $61,500/year if you stop at 40 (a 55-year retirement) and $99,000/year if you wait until 67 (28 years) — the same portfolio, 1.6× the spending:

Retiring at 60 with a different amount

Your number may not be $2M, so here is the same calculation run for every rung of the ladder at 60 — from $500k ($17,500/year) up to $5M ($203,500/year), all after the tax owed on the withdrawals:

Assumptions: single filer, TX (no state income tax), 60% taxable / 30% traditional / 10% Roth split, 6% nominal return, 3% inflation, no Social Security. Add Social Security, a pension, part-time income, or a spouse in the calculator and the safe number rises — often substantially.

Coordinating Social Security timing with the conversion gap years

At 60, the years before you claim Social Security are the calmest your tax return will ever look. Delaying benefits toward 70 raises the eventual check and works as longevity insurance, and it also keeps ordinary income low in the interim — leaving room to convert traditional balances to Roth at favorable rates before both Social Security and required minimum distributions switch on.

The planning turns on what happens when those income sources arrive. Once benefits and RMDs stack on top of investment income, several thresholds can trigger at once: a higher marginal bracket, Medicare premium surcharges (IRMAA) tied to income two years prior, and the net investment income tax on gains and dividends above a threshold. Conversions done early, in the gap years, shrink the traditional balance that would otherwise drive all three later.

• Use the low-income gap years to convert deliberately, bracket by bracket.
• Weigh each conversion against the IRMAA threshold two years out.
• Treat delayed Social Security as insurance against a long life, not just a math bet.

Common questions

Keep exploring